Yes, this is it.For example, if definitely established that a child should come with an open back, hydrocephalus or entirely bad blemishes on the world and there is also a fear that it will not survive, then it usually encourages the mother, an abortion make.
HelloActually, I’m against abortion because I believe that anyone who has sex should also take responsibility. So if someone says anything to prevent having to grab himself was on the nose and take responsibility.I can understand it but when a person has an abortion after a rape. The woman is not his fault and I can also understand that it represents a psychological burden because they would see in the eyes of a child, perhaps the rapist.Much love
There are exceptions, however, clear whether it is justified but depends on each ownI will never abort for me it would be inconsistent with myselfBut if people can live life to destroy it ok because it is the problem itand I would condemn anyone so
If you voluntarily make your legs wide for lovemaking, then you have to live with the consequences and in the case of a pregnancy are available to the child.I find it disgusting when a child is done away just out of sheer convenience “. Such people deserve permanent infertility, and severe mental depression until her death.
This question is still quite a Sugestivfrage – whether an abortion is justified “. . . Every woman must decide for yourself – and no one can arrogate to relieve her of that right.I’m sure no ardent pro-abortion – but hardly a woman makes a decision so easy.
. . . So, in the whole – even decades continued – discussion on this subject fascinates me above all else:Calculated that people who never give birth to children, believe that they have a (negative) opinion might have on the topic. Politicians, men, old women, the clergy. . .Especially the latter likes to preach about the unborn child and do not give a fig about the already born.I can not and will therefore receive any position. It is not for me.
In Ecclesiastes, 6th 3 to 6 6, there is an interesting answer.PS to estimate the answer, you should first read what is written, it is God’s word that it is.
If the girl was raped / impregnated the woman and thus, unfortunately, I do not think it’s morally wrong to abort the child. The woman (zumindist can) many women will not love their child or simply give her child to school in it. That makes both just a mental wreck.If jmd but wants an abortion because of the convenience, I am against it. Let them avoid or celibate.
Of course! A woman is not an incubator, but a person with a free will. If she decides that her body is ready for the growth of a child, abortion is justified in any case. – Prevention would be the sensible approach, but the reason is not something that remains, what drives us humans to act. –Every child has the right, wanted to be! Every mother has the right to a pregnancy and motherhood to be ready.
The welfare of the child plays a large role in this instance.Who is not in the location is everything to give the child love, affection and emotional support (basic needs), the person should have a child.
Honestly, this kind of discussion makes me sick.It does not matter how and why abortion is a woman.It is solely the decision of this woman. Your responsibility.This woman has to life with this decision, nobody else.
That there are probably some.Like other have said rape, for example. Then we can really nothing to suggest that they became pregnant.Ansich is a difficult issue.I see it this way: in-itself, it’s true: A baby has the right to come into the world. BUT: The mother also has the right to determine what happens to her body. It is, after all of them.And if one now as the lives completely changed, the woman has severe depression and it does not durchsteht, I can understand.The baby was not even born yet, so it gets really not with him and happened to no harm. The unborn human being who does not know what he has missed.The woman is, however, is THE life. Since I find much that life is one of the woman more if it would be ruined by the birth.However, one should then also have to think about adoption.And of course it is extremely sad that people around carelessly so not easy to prevent and then abort.@ Maxcem: About what you’ve got already some rape written.
Although it is now thumbs down, I should hail will tell you what an unborn child, and therefore there is no excuse or justification for an abortion.Every child whether born or unborn, is a thought of God and has a right to life.Every abortion is murder, no matter at what happens when abortion.Greetings, Roland
If the child in the womb is dead or not viable outside of which,then it is probably justifiable to remove the child from the womb.That would be, strictly speaking, no abortion, but a miscarriage.When the child comes from a rape or if the mother is otherwise not trusted to love the child and raise them properly, which argues against a then RELEASE FOR ADOPTION?A schoolgirl may participate up to the last days before the birth of the lessons, as a student or Azubine, if their anatomy, it would require that the baby be brought through a caesarean section.In my view, a clear question of conflicting rights:The convenience of the motheragainst the life of a child.There are SO MANY involuntarily childless couples in Germany,that you could give ALL unwanted children into a loving home!The adoptive parents would CERTAINLY help the young mother and material;that would even be a win-win situation:The mother receives aid for life or for training, or both, at least, the adoptive parents know the birth mother with a financial burden is considerably less!You could even create an agency, gives the unwanted children born before they are! The would-be adoptive parents would be happy to know the girl pregnant and take less in the family.You could buy the pregnant woman, so to speak, the child “, be it 1000 or 2000 € to get to abort the child does not unsubscribe, but up for adoption and, ultimately does not matter.Even if that should mean that children are begotten DELIBERATELY to sell “them, and then stay in Germany for € 2000 and boost the German economy is still better for Germany,as if the 2000 € in India or Molukkistan land, but in addition 1000e € for the gasoline to flow into Arabia, at the “poor” to subsidize oil sheiks.The cost of a birth are not likely to exceed the cost of an abortion, so long as every year hundreds of thousands of children are born less than dying old man, one could easily facilitate the conditions for adoption – then we would solve three problems at once:- Declining tax revenues,- Shortage of skilled workers- Aging of societyWhich party wants to establish itself as the first?@ Bettina S: God created man TOTALLY WITHOUT diseases.He has then picked himself to die.@ peterjosefsp: It says:(Ecclesiastes 6:3-6) “If a man could father a hundred times and he lived for many years, so that the days of his years were many, but his own soul is not sated with good things and has given him the grave [not] has become, I must say that a prematurely born is better off than he. 4 For nothing of this has come, and then he goes into darkness, darkness, and with his own name will be covered. 5 The sun also he has seen no yet known. This has taken more rest than the previous one. 6 Even that he has lived one thousand years twice, and he has not seen yet, which is good – not everyone goes to e i n e s place? “This is not to say that abortion is somehow excusable, but that a joyless, meaningless life is even worse than being aborted.In Moses is also clear that those who must pay for causing the death of an unborn child, with life itself.@ Christopher M: Read my response times@ depri: Are you still depressed? Your good answers lift our spirits as we can return you this?@
rape, and u is a severe, incurable disease or fetal harm.to tinalow mülltone there was still the baby of the valve device in every major hospital. or only a little later release them for adoption, or at least sell. But life does not belong in the dustbin and anticipatory murder is no alternative. jo.
God gives life and God takes lifeabortion does not justify any exceptionseven if the ground is given to the newborn onewill have a disability, it has to live exactly the same right to be both a non-disabled child.one must be clear that any act to follow with it drawsand these also contributeI am not the slightest justification is a declaration, an abortion would.
since you asked the question in the rubric religion have I give you the answer in the Bible as it stands.It says that, as everyone knows-thou shalt not kill. and life is sacred. life is formed in the distribution of the cells! So it’s living when we know not yet viell whether we are pregnant. if it were an abortion-then breaks a bid, which is in the bible. text can be found in the Bible is by no: but if a man is ill or disabled, or not-so kill these people. life is life and abortion is undoubtedly murder.besides, there are now ways and means how to avoid that one is pregnant. (apart from the 0.1% of the people that are really pregnant, even though they pill…. properly take)fazit: doctors sometimes give to abort the child-rat because it would impede or whatever. But there is no purely biblical exception.
Yes, of course, and writes all of this should have no site is available in the mother staggered before he unpacks the missionary’s Sword!1. Rape (Some mothers always reminded the child to the perpetrator)2. Disease in the mother or child (Some pregnancies endangering the life of the mother or the Kimden is not viable)
I think as a non-affected one must have an opinion on the subject and express it.For me there is only one reason: If the existing life is endangered by the birth. However, it is also there before the ethical dilemma that we so decide whose life is worth more.Even a rape would be no reason for me: For the child can be absolutely nothing in return. Certainly, this is not easy for the affected and the child will suffer if the mother has taken place not well processed.Absolutely no reason would be a disease: People are not machines, who have to work as one wants. Unfortunately, yes just to show the media that more and more people want to work. Since nannies, psychologists or drugs are called to repair the seemingly broken man.I know of several cases in the family inherited when it experienced miscarriages. My grandmother was made pretty early on that the child probably would not survive. You remove yourself decisive for the child and can not be decided from the outside when the child stribt. She has repeatedly told how she is glad to have made this decision. So you had the opportunity to adopt from the child and was saved from any guilt.At my mother, there were similar problems in the first pregnancy and my grandma she has talked well, it still unsubscribe. And my mother was very happy about the decision afterward. At my sister will all be clearer. She had two complicated pregnancies. The first time she had an abortion and then she went quite a long time dirty. That the second pregnancy would also lead to a non-viable child was then another fire in open wounds. It is important to hear, this time on the advice of my grandmother and my mother. It was anything but easy for you and for us. She suffered a lot and could not accept that their child will not survive. The doctors spoke very strongly to her, and she broke off an abortion almost at the last minute. She says now that the sight of living alone for two hours babies it was worth the agony to go through him. She feels that they have received much gratitude from the child and we had the feeling that they are directly transferred to my sister, because shortly after birth, she was almost eerily happy and satisfied. This had everything even’s out of context. A friend was unintentionally pregnant and wanted an abortion, then what about my sister did not. Exaggerate, said she is now glad to have not sent the child to the happy hunting grounds, but her former friend, who was probably the driving force behind the abortion request.
Of course. Unsubscribe, any “exception”, which prohibits women morally or medically, a child must be respected. That can take no faith, I mean. (For a pregnancy due to rape, pregnancy, despite socially unsustainable conditions, pregnancy with the risk of his own death of the mother), all this would be a pregnancy which may produce an unwanted child might. And if such a child comes in spite of all the resistors on the world, it is not certain, but probable, that his life is under extreme pressure from the outset. Who then is responsible? Who cares then? Who will take responsibility? All those who are against abortion? Do I want to doubt it. / KG
January 31st, 2010 at 5:45 pm
No, every life counts,it is whether one is disabledor the mother has no desire for education.
January 31st, 2010 at 6:21 pm
Everyone is free to decide how an abortion is justified for him, so imagine the issue is best your conscience.
January 31st, 2010 at 6:48 pm
yes because abortion is not objectionable, to allow better to die than the baby in the trash!
January 31st, 2010 at 6:52 pm
I agree with robert @.
January 31st, 2010 at 7:23 pm
Yes, this is it.For example, if definitely established that a child should come with an open back, hydrocephalus or entirely bad blemishes on the world and there is also a fear that it will not survive, then it usually encourages the mother, an abortion make.
January 31st, 2010 at 7:43 pm
HelloActually, I’m against abortion because I believe that anyone who has sex should also take responsibility. So if someone says anything to prevent having to grab himself was on the nose and take responsibility.I can understand it but when a person has an abortion after a rape. The woman is not his fault and I can also understand that it represents a psychological burden because they would see in the eyes of a child, perhaps the rapist.Much love
January 31st, 2010 at 8:07 pm
There are exceptions, however, clear whether it is justified but depends on each ownI will never abort for me it would be inconsistent with myselfBut if people can live life to destroy it ok because it is the problem itand I would condemn anyone so
January 31st, 2010 at 8:34 pm
If you voluntarily make your legs wide for lovemaking, then you have to live with the consequences and in the case of a pregnancy are available to the child.I find it disgusting when a child is done away just out of sheer convenience “. Such people deserve permanent infertility, and severe mental depression until her death.
January 31st, 2010 at 8:55 pm
This question is still quite a Sugestivfrage – whether an abortion is justified “. . . Every woman must decide for yourself – and no one can arrogate to relieve her of that right.I’m sure no ardent pro-abortion – but hardly a woman makes a decision so easy.
January 31st, 2010 at 9:16 pm
Wrong question! The right question is: why God sends people with a disability to life on earth.God loves you, and Jesus is your savior.
January 31st, 2010 at 9:29 pm
. . . So, in the whole – even decades continued – discussion on this subject fascinates me above all else:Calculated that people who never give birth to children, believe that they have a (negative) opinion might have on the topic. Politicians, men, old women, the clergy. . .Especially the latter likes to preach about the unborn child and do not give a fig about the already born.I can not and will therefore receive any position. It is not for me.
January 31st, 2010 at 10:19 pm
In Ecclesiastes, 6th 3 to 6 6, there is an interesting answer.PS to estimate the answer, you should first read what is written, it is God’s word that it is.
January 31st, 2010 at 10:39 pm
If the girl was raped / impregnated the woman and thus, unfortunately, I do not think it’s morally wrong to abort the child. The woman (zumindist can) many women will not love their child or simply give her child to school in it. That makes both just a mental wreck.If jmd but wants an abortion because of the convenience, I am against it. Let them avoid or celibate.
January 31st, 2010 at 10:58 pm
Of course! A woman is not an incubator, but a person with a free will. If she decides that her body is ready for the growth of a child, abortion is justified in any case. – Prevention would be the sensible approach, but the reason is not something that remains, what drives us humans to act. –Every child has the right, wanted to be! Every mother has the right to a pregnancy and motherhood to be ready.
January 31st, 2010 at 11:01 pm
@ JizzSay, you’ve been thinking quite right Indein not yet live, eh?I think that the only correct answer here@ Buko has given.
January 31st, 2010 at 11:46 pm
The welfare of the child plays a large role in this instance.Who is not in the location is everything to give the child love, affection and emotional support (basic needs), the person should have a child.
February 1st, 2010 at 12:24 am
Danger to life and nothilfe.
February 1st, 2010 at 12:46 am
All very “nice” responses. Not one has borne in mind that you can become pregnant through rape! How are things on this one?
February 1st, 2010 at 12:56 am
Honestly, this kind of discussion makes me sick.It does not matter how and why abortion is a woman.It is solely the decision of this woman. Your responsibility.This woman has to life with this decision, nobody else.
February 1st, 2010 at 1:35 am
I am totally against abortion.I can not see from the Word of God,that it should be allowed in a specific case.
February 1st, 2010 at 2:03 am
An exception should be created if the pregnancy is caused by rape or if the woman risked her life by the pregnancy.
February 1st, 2010 at 2:45 am
That there are probably some.Like other have said rape, for example. Then we can really nothing to suggest that they became pregnant.Ansich is a difficult issue.I see it this way: in-itself, it’s true: A baby has the right to come into the world. BUT: The mother also has the right to determine what happens to her body. It is, after all of them.And if one now as the lives completely changed, the woman has severe depression and it does not durchsteht, I can understand.The baby was not even born yet, so it gets really not with him and happened to no harm. The unborn human being who does not know what he has missed.The woman is, however, is THE life. Since I find much that life is one of the woman more if it would be ruined by the birth.However, one should then also have to think about adoption.And of course it is extremely sad that people around carelessly so not easy to prevent and then abort.@ Maxcem: About what you’ve got already some rape written.
February 1st, 2010 at 2:55 am
Although it is now thumbs down, I should hail will tell you what an unborn child, and therefore there is no excuse or justification for an abortion.Every child whether born or unborn, is a thought of God and has a right to life.Every abortion is murder, no matter at what happens when abortion.Greetings, Roland
February 1st, 2010 at 3:17 am
Stupid questions are, unfortunately, no reason for the “morning-after pill”.
February 1st, 2010 at 3:23 am
If the child in the womb is dead or not viable outside of which,then it is probably justifiable to remove the child from the womb.That would be, strictly speaking, no abortion, but a miscarriage.When the child comes from a rape or if the mother is otherwise not trusted to love the child and raise them properly, which argues against a then RELEASE FOR ADOPTION?A schoolgirl may participate up to the last days before the birth of the lessons, as a student or Azubine, if their anatomy, it would require that the baby be brought through a caesarean section.In my view, a clear question of conflicting rights:The convenience of the motheragainst the life of a child.There are SO MANY involuntarily childless couples in Germany,that you could give ALL unwanted children into a loving home!The adoptive parents would CERTAINLY help the young mother and material;that would even be a win-win situation:The mother receives aid for life or for training, or both, at least, the adoptive parents know the birth mother with a financial burden is considerably less!You could even create an agency, gives the unwanted children born before they are! The would-be adoptive parents would be happy to know the girl pregnant and take less in the family.You could buy the pregnant woman, so to speak, the child “, be it 1000 or 2000 € to get to abort the child does not unsubscribe, but up for adoption and, ultimately does not matter.Even if that should mean that children are begotten DELIBERATELY to sell “them, and then stay in Germany for € 2000 and boost the German economy is still better for Germany,as if the 2000 € in India or Molukkistan land, but in addition 1000e € for the gasoline to flow into Arabia, at the “poor” to subsidize oil sheiks.The cost of a birth are not likely to exceed the cost of an abortion, so long as every year hundreds of thousands of children are born less than dying old man, one could easily facilitate the conditions for adoption – then we would solve three problems at once:- Declining tax revenues,- Shortage of skilled workers- Aging of societyWhich party wants to establish itself as the first?@ Bettina S: God created man TOTALLY WITHOUT diseases.He has then picked himself to die.@ peterjosefsp: It says:(Ecclesiastes 6:3-6) “If a man could father a hundred times and he lived for many years, so that the days of his years were many, but his own soul is not sated with good things and has given him the grave [not] has become, I must say that a prematurely born is better off than he. 4 For nothing of this has come, and then he goes into darkness, darkness, and with his own name will be covered. 5 The sun also he has seen no yet known. This has taken more rest than the previous one. 6 Even that he has lived one thousand years twice, and he has not seen yet, which is good – not everyone goes to e i n e s place? “This is not to say that abortion is somehow excusable, but that a joyless, meaningless life is even worse than being aborted.In Moses is also clear that those who must pay for causing the death of an unborn child, with life itself.@ Christopher M: Read my response times@ depri: Are you still depressed? Your good answers lift our spirits as we can return you this?@
February 1st, 2010 at 3:36 am
rape, and u is a severe, incurable disease or fetal harm.to tinalow mülltone there was still the baby of the valve device in every major hospital. or only a little later release them for adoption, or at least sell. But life does not belong in the dustbin and anticipatory murder is no alternative. jo.
February 1st, 2010 at 3:44 am
God gives life and God takes lifeabortion does not justify any exceptionseven if the ground is given to the newborn onewill have a disability, it has to live exactly the same right to be both a non-disabled child.one must be clear that any act to follow with it drawsand these also contributeI am not the slightest justification is a declaration, an abortion would.
February 1st, 2010 at 4:39 am
yes, but intended only for the wealthy believers
February 1st, 2010 at 5:10 am
No!
February 1st, 2010 at 5:24 am
since you asked the question in the rubric religion have I give you the answer in the Bible as it stands.It says that, as everyone knows-thou shalt not kill. and life is sacred. life is formed in the distribution of the cells! So it’s living when we know not yet viell whether we are pregnant. if it were an abortion-then breaks a bid, which is in the bible. text can be found in the Bible is by no: but if a man is ill or disabled, or not-so kill these people. life is life and abortion is undoubtedly murder.besides, there are now ways and means how to avoid that one is pregnant. (apart from the 0.1% of the people that are really pregnant, even though they pill…. properly take)fazit: doctors sometimes give to abort the child-rat because it would impede or whatever. But there is no purely biblical exception.
February 1st, 2010 at 5:43 am
I think that if the mental health of the expectant mother is at stake (for example, rape), everyone should have understanding.
February 1st, 2010 at 5:45 am
Yes, of course, and writes all of this should have no site is available in the mother staggered before he unpacks the missionary’s Sword!1. Rape (Some mothers always reminded the child to the perpetrator)2. Disease in the mother or child (Some pregnancies endangering the life of the mother or the Kimden is not viable)
February 1st, 2010 at 5:53 am
I think as a non-affected one must have an opinion on the subject and express it.For me there is only one reason: If the existing life is endangered by the birth. However, it is also there before the ethical dilemma that we so decide whose life is worth more.Even a rape would be no reason for me: For the child can be absolutely nothing in return. Certainly, this is not easy for the affected and the child will suffer if the mother has taken place not well processed.Absolutely no reason would be a disease: People are not machines, who have to work as one wants. Unfortunately, yes just to show the media that more and more people want to work. Since nannies, psychologists or drugs are called to repair the seemingly broken man.I know of several cases in the family inherited when it experienced miscarriages. My grandmother was made pretty early on that the child probably would not survive. You remove yourself decisive for the child and can not be decided from the outside when the child stribt. She has repeatedly told how she is glad to have made this decision. So you had the opportunity to adopt from the child and was saved from any guilt.At my mother, there were similar problems in the first pregnancy and my grandma she has talked well, it still unsubscribe. And my mother was very happy about the decision afterward. At my sister will all be clearer. She had two complicated pregnancies. The first time she had an abortion and then she went quite a long time dirty. That the second pregnancy would also lead to a non-viable child was then another fire in open wounds. It is important to hear, this time on the advice of my grandmother and my mother. It was anything but easy for you and for us. She suffered a lot and could not accept that their child will not survive. The doctors spoke very strongly to her, and she broke off an abortion almost at the last minute. She says now that the sight of living alone for two hours babies it was worth the agony to go through him. She feels that they have received much gratitude from the child and we had the feeling that they are directly transferred to my sister, because shortly after birth, she was almost eerily happy and satisfied. This had everything even’s out of context. A friend was unintentionally pregnant and wanted an abortion, then what about my sister did not. Exaggerate, said she is now glad to have not sent the child to the happy hunting grounds, but her former friend, who was probably the driving force behind the abortion request.
February 1st, 2010 at 5:55 am
Of course. Unsubscribe, any “exception”, which prohibits women morally or medically, a child must be respected. That can take no faith, I mean. (For a pregnancy due to rape, pregnancy, despite socially unsustainable conditions, pregnancy with the risk of his own death of the mother), all this would be a pregnancy which may produce an unwanted child might. And if such a child comes in spite of all the resistors on the world, it is not certain, but probable, that his life is under extreme pressure from the outset. Who then is responsible? Who cares then? Who will take responsibility? All those who are against abortion? Do I want to doubt it. / KG